Bharath Nishok Kumaran vs Adam Farag Cao Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 May at 01:03 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Nishok Kumaran vs A. Farag Cao

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kumaran 1 - 0 Cao
They have played 2 sets in total, with Bharath Nishok Kumaran winning 2 and Adam Farag Cao winning 0. The last match between Bharath Nishok Kumaran and Adam Farag Cao was at the M15 Tashkent, 28-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Bharath Nishok Kumaran getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kumaran | 1 |
| Cao | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Tashkent(05-28-25)
B. N. Kumaran vs A. F. Cao H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 46.45% (85-98) | Career Total W/L | 47.06% (24-27) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. N. Kumaran vs A. F. Cao Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Over the past six months, Kumar has secured 39.04% of points on their second serve, whereas Cao achieved 48.75%. Does this give Cao an advantage? It's likely, given the strong correlation with match predictions.
- Return Game Stats: Recently, Kumaran has won 47.35% of opponents' second serve points versus Cao's 42.86%. When it comes to first serve returns, Cao leads slightly with 23.04%, compared to Kumaran's 20.25%.
- Pressure Handling: Kumaran has saved 51.46% of breakpoints, while Cao's saving rate is a higher 66.67%, providing a potential edge in high-stress situations.
- Yearly Performance: Kumaran has a winning rate of 53.85% over the past year, compared to Cao's 47.83%, suggesting Kumaran is slightly more consistent overall.
- Surface Preferences: Kumaran favors hard courts with a 48% win rate, while Cao also performs best on hard surfaces, winning 56% of matches.
- Competitive Level: Both players participate mainly in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, with Kumaran winning 54.9% of matches and Cao 50%. How does this affect their head-to-head? It illustrates competitive parity at this level.
- Opponent Quality: On average, Kumaran has faced opponents ranked 215.13, while Cao encountered tougher opponents with an average rank of 123.57.
- Deciding Set Performance: In the last year, Kumaran has won 63% of deciding sets, significantly outperforming Cao's 25% success rate.
- Break Point Conversion: Recently, Kumaran converted 26.09% of breakpoint chances, slightly trailing behind Cao's 28.57%.
Editorial Prediction (May 28, 2025, UTC):
Kumaran and Cao enter their match with varied strengths and weaknesses that offer intriguing insights into potential outcomes.
While Kumaran shows better consistency and skill in deciding sets, Cao's superior second serve performance and breakpoint saving ability could serve as decisive factors.
Both players have demonstrated proficiency on hard courts, but Cao's experience against higher-ranked opponents might give them the confidence edge in this matchup.
Considering these factors, Cao seems slightly more poised to win the upcoming match, though Kumaran's mental fortitude in tight situations cannot be underestimated.
Bharath Nishok Kumaran vs Adam Farag Cao Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. N. Kumaran vs A. F. Cao H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:4:22 | Average Match Time | 1:4:22 |
| 62% (21/34) | 1st Serve % | 44% (21/48) |
| 81% (17/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 46% (6/13) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (10/27) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 52% (25/48) | Return Points Win % | 32% (11/34) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. N. Kumaran Recent Matches Played
A. F. Cao Recent Matches Played

B. N. Kumaran vs A. F. Cao Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.45% (85/98) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.06% (24/27) |
| 46.78% (189/215) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.62% (53/56) |
| 48.69% (1836/1935) | Games Win/Loss | 50.55% (509/498) |
| 47.83% (66/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 42.22% (19/26) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.67% (14/16) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 254 | Aces Total | 74 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 345 | Total Double Faults | 103 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 237.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 239.24 |
| 54% (3287/6143) | 1st Serve % | 52% (858/1637) |
| 67% (2205/3287) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (576/858) |
| 47% (1343/2856) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (345/778) |
| 44% (279/629) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 34% (48/141) |
| 40% (2414/6044) | Return Points Win % | 36% (563/1564) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 47.22% (85/95) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (24/24) |
| 47% (84/180) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (24/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (15/30) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 38% (3/8) |
| 51% (20/39) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 85% (85/72) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (25/22) |
| 15% (85/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (25/3) |
| 13% (98/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 8% (26/2) |